issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 265056503 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Resample / upsample behavior diverges from pandas · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 336592618 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1631#issuecomment-336592618 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1631 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNjU5MjYxOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-10-13T23:54:51Z | 2017-10-13T23:54:51Z | MEMBER | Let's see where the pandas discussion ends up. If xarray had a method for interpolating to fill missing values, achieving your desired result would be as a simple as chaining another interpolate call, e.g., |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Resample / upsample behavior diverges from pandas 265056503 | |
| 336578729 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1631#issuecomment-336578729 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1631 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNjU3ODcyOQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-10-13T22:05:41Z | 2017-10-13T22:05:41Z | MEMBER | The key difference appears to be:
- In xarray, I think this is a bug in pandas, since the behavior is inconsistent with other resample methods like
More generally: (This does suggest that xarray could use a direct Another example: ```
It is useful that pandas's upsampling is only repeating values within the previously valid range. Otherwise it is likely to interpolate over true data gaps. As another use-case: suppose we have a temperature dataset with 3 hourly measurements, and we want to upsample it to 1 hour resolution. Occasionally, measurements are missing for day(s) at a time, which we mark with missing values (suppose the server running the model ran out of disk space). It is useful to be able to resample to a higher resolution without entirely unrealistic interpolation over data gaps. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Resample / upsample behavior diverges from pandas 265056503 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1