issues: 265056503
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 265056503 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNjUwNTY1MDM= | 1631 | Resample / upsample behavior diverges from pandas | 2443309 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2017-10-12T19:22:44Z | 2017-12-30T06:21:42Z | 2017-12-30T06:21:42Z | MEMBER | I've found a few issues where xarray's new resample / upsample functionality is diverging from Pandas. I think they are mostly surrounding how NaNs are treated. Thoughts from @shoyer, @darothen and others. Gist with all the juicy details: https://gist.github.com/jhamman/354f0e5ff32a39550ffd25800e7214fc#file-xarray_resample-ipynb xref: #1608, #1272 |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1631/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed | 13221727 | issue |