issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 259935100 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Dataset.copy() drops encoding · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
334954046 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-334954046 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDk1NDA0Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-10-07T17:52:22Z | 2017-10-07T17:52:22Z | MEMBER | I'm OK copying encoding, but we do still need to figure out general rules for propagating it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 | |
334907267 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-334907267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDkwNzI2Nw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-07T03:29:48Z | 2017-10-07T03:29:48Z | MEMBER | @crusaderky - After thinking about it, I'm still a 👍 on copying the encoding in this case. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 | |
334857886 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-334857886 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDg1Nzg4Ng== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2017-10-06T20:10:33Z | 2017-10-06T20:10:33Z | MEMBER | Can we reach a resolution on this? It's blocking #1551... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 | |
331770787 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-331770787 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTc3MDc4Nw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-25T03:50:19Z | 2017-09-25T03:50:19Z | MEMBER | I agree that we haven't done a good job defining how |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 | |
331754521 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-331754521 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTc1NDUyMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-25T01:20:08Z | 2017-09-25T01:20:08Z | MEMBER | I think this was intentional at one point, but to be honest we never carefully defined the semantics for preserving My original thought (along the lines of some of my comments in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1297), was that we should not propagate That said, I can see why this rule would be confusing and we haven't done a good job of enforcing it. Possibly a better policy would be " |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 | |
331725939 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1586#issuecomment-331725939 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1586 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTcyNTkzOQ== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2017-09-24T17:36:21Z | 2017-09-24T17:36:21Z | MEMBER | By looking at the code, copy() is the only case where it is proper to pass the encoding to _construct_direct, but somebody please confirm |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.copy() drops encoding 259935100 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3