issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 183218516 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 257748638 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-257748638 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1Nzc0ODYzOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-02T01:35:49Z | 2016-11-02T01:35:49Z | MEMBER | OK, I'm just going to merge this. We can iterate on this more later. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
| 254814590 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254814590 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDgxNDU5MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-10-19T13:37:21Z | 2016-10-19T13:37:21Z | MEMBER |
@shoyer could you elaborate on that? If there's a way to make it right I am happy to try, but I'm afraid I'm not sure what is the way to go. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
| 254015789 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254015789 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAxNTc4OQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-10-15T22:49:54Z | 2016-10-15T22:49:54Z | MEMBER | Ok, done. The second problem about the coordinate variable seems trickier to solve though... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
| 254005880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254005880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAwNTg4MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-10-15T19:30:15Z | 2016-10-15T19:30:15Z | MEMBER | Alternatively, it looks like the issue is on line 266 where we iterate
This has the advantage of preserving the set, which is important if there is a very large number of variables. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
| 254005549 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254005549 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAwNTU0OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-10-15T19:25:26Z | 2016-10-15T19:25:26Z | MEMBER | Agreed, this is the better approach. Thanks for diving into this! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2