issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 183218516 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
257748638 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-257748638 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1Nzc0ODYzOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-02T01:35:49Z | 2016-11-02T01:35:49Z | MEMBER | OK, I'm just going to merge this. We can iterate on this more later. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
254814590 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254814590 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDgxNDU5MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-10-19T13:37:21Z | 2016-10-19T13:37:21Z | MEMBER |
@shoyer could you elaborate on that? If there's a way to make it right I am happy to try, but I'm afraid I'm not sure what is the way to go. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
254015789 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254015789 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAxNTc4OQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-10-15T22:49:54Z | 2016-10-15T22:49:54Z | MEMBER | Ok, done. The second problem about the coordinate variable seems trickier to solve though... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
254005880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254005880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAwNTg4MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-10-15T19:30:15Z | 2016-10-15T19:30:15Z | MEMBER | Alternatively, it looks like the issue is on line 266 where we iterate
This has the advantage of preserving the set, which is important if there is a very large number of variables. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 | |
254005549 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1049#issuecomment-254005549 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDAwNTU0OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-10-15T19:25:26Z | 2016-10-15T19:25:26Z | MEMBER | Agreed, this is the better approach. Thanks for diving into this! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve variables order in Dataset.concat() 183218516 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2