issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 1535387692 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1460450199 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1460450199 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XDLOX | keewis 14808389 | 2023-03-08T16:22:19Z | 2023-03-08T16:23:36Z | MEMBER | I agree, those do indeed seem unrelated, and I have no idea why the python 3.11 macos CI takes that long to run. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1460423854 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1460423854 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XDEyu | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2023-03-08T16:07:39Z | 2023-03-08T16:07:39Z | MEMBER | Thanks @keewis -- I pushed a fix. The documentation build succeeded. The other build failures look unrelated. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1460178545 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1460178545 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XCI5x | keewis 14808389 | 2023-03-08T13:46:19Z | 2023-03-08T13:46:19Z | MEMBER | the docs failure is real, I think we need to update https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/821dc24b5f3ed91b843a634bf8513a26046269ef/doc/user-guide/weather-climate.rst#L236 to use the new parameter (not sure how exactly, though) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1459195989 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1459195989 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W-ZBV | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2023-03-08T02:34:37Z | 2023-03-08T02:34:37Z | MEMBER | @keewis and @dcherian indeed I just wanted to give it another once over. I think it should be ready for review now. Thanks for your patience on this! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1458219179 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1458219179 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W6qir | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-07T13:57:20Z | 2023-03-07T13:57:20Z | MEMBER | Shall we merge? AFAICT all groupby and resample tests now pass on |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1458210029 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1458210029 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W6oTt | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-07T13:51:49Z | 2023-03-07T13:51:49Z | MEMBER |
The version in that PR is just a container for the factorize method. I'm waiting for this to get merged before continuing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 | |
1457979204 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7444#issuecomment-1457979204 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7444 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W5v9E | keewis 14808389 | 2023-03-07T11:08:07Z | 2023-03-07T11:08:07Z | MEMBER | both the failing upstream-dev CI and the failing docs CI seem to be unrelated to this. The So considering that, how much do you think is needed until we can merge this? And can I help with anything? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preserve `base` and `loffset` arguments in `resample` 1535387692 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3