issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 1519058102 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1384016578 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7415#issuecomment-1384016578 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7415 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85SfmrC | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-16T12:56:25Z | 2023-01-16T12:59:22Z | MEMBER | do we need to worry about this:
Edit: to answer my own question: no, because most of the the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` 1519058102 | |
| 1371344257 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7415#issuecomment-1371344257 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7415 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RvQ2B | max-sixty 5635139 | 2023-01-04T19:42:56Z | 2023-01-04T19:42:56Z | MEMBER |
This should now be releasing! https://github.com/numbagg/numbagg/releases/tag/v0.2.2 |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 2,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` 1519058102 | |
| 1371035994 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7415#issuecomment-1371035994 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7415 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RuFla | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-04T14:59:28Z | 2023-01-04T14:59:46Z | MEMBER | ah, that makes sense, thanks. I must have missed that line while checking the package metadata. This has even been fixed since then, but not released. @max-sixty, would it be possible to issue a new release? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` 1519058102 | |
| 1371028352 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7415#issuecomment-1371028352 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7415 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RuDuA | ocefpaf 950575 | 2023-01-04T14:53:15Z | 2023-01-04T14:53:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
It is not a conda problem but a bug upstream. The See https://github.com/numbagg/numbagg/blob/v0.2.1/setup.py#L24 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` 1519058102 | |
| 1371019131 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7415#issuecomment-1371019131 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7415 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RuBd7 | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-04T14:45:28Z | 2023-01-04T14:45:28Z | MEMBER | that looks like it works, besides the fact that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
install `numbagg` from `conda-forge` 1519058102 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3