issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 1440711212 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Handle division by zero in _Normalize._calc_widths · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1311279880 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7272#issuecomment-1311279880 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7272 IC_kwDOAMm_X85OKIsI Illviljan 14371165 2022-11-11T06:24:06Z 2022-11-11T06:26:40Z MEMBER
  • default markersize values of widths are 18 to 72.
  • plt.scatter default markersize is 36.
  • plt.plot default linewidth is 6.

With the current version of the PR we would get 18 for 1-sized arrays, but 36 if markersize was undefined. This seems a bit inconsistent to me. I think we should default to 36 instead for 1-sized arrays, but this would require a bit more tweaks than the scope of the current PR.

I think we'll merge this to fix the zero division -> np.nan -> empty plots. And then I'll come up with a another PR where the size is the same.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Handle division by zero in _Normalize._calc_widths 1440711212

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);