issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1423312198 and user = 90008 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Remove debugging slow assert statement · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1291948502 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291948502 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85NAZHW | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T12:19:49Z | 2022-10-26T12:23:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I know it is not comparable, but I was really curious what "dictionary insertion" costs, in order to be able to understand if my comparisons were fair: code```python from tqdm import tqdm import xarray as xr from time import perf_counter import numpy as np N = 1000 # Everybody is lazy loading now, so lets force modules to get instantiated dummy_dataset = xr.Dataset() dummy_dataset['a'] = 1 dummy_dataset['b'] = 1 del dummy_dataset time_elapsed = np.zeros(N) # dataset = xr.Dataset() dataset = {} for i in tqdm(range(N)): # for i in range(N): time_start = perf_counter() dataset[f"var{i}"] = i time_end = perf_counter() time_elapsed[i] = time_end - time_start # %% from matplotlib import pyplot as plt plt.plot(np.arange(N), time_elapsed * 1E6, label='Time to add one variable') plt.xlabel("Number of existing variables") plt.ylabel("Time to add a variables (us)") plt.ylim([0, 10]) plt.title("Dictionary insertion") plt.grid(True) ```
I think xarray gives me 3 order of magnitude of "thinking" benefit, so I'll take it!
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 | |
| 1291894024 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291894024 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85NAL0I | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T11:32:32Z | 2022-10-26T11:32:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok. I'll want to rethink them. I know it looks quadratic time, but i really would like to test n=1000 and i have an idea |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 | |
| 1291450556 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291450556 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-fi8 | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T03:32:53Z | 2022-10-26T03:32:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm somewhat ocnfused, I can run the benchmark locally ``` [ 1.80%] ··· dataset_creation.Creation.time_dataset_creation 4.37±0s ``` |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 | |
| 1291447746 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291447746 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-e3C | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T03:27:36Z | 2022-10-26T03:27:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | :/ not fun, the benchmark is failing. not sure why. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 | |
| 1291399714 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291399714 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-TIi | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T02:14:40Z | 2022-10-26T02:14:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I wasn't able to find something that really benchmarked "large" datasets.
Added one. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 | |
| 1291389702 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7221#issuecomment-1291389702 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7221 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85M-QsG | hmaarrfk 90008 | 2022-10-26T01:59:57Z | 2022-10-26T01:59:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Spyder profiler |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Remove debugging slow assert statement 1423312198 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);

user 1