issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 1389176083 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Don't cast NaN to integer · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1510407267 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1510407267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aBvxj | kxxt 18085551 | 2023-04-16T15:01:24Z | 2023-04-16T15:01:24Z | NONE | Hi, is there any reason that keeps this pr from being merged? This PR is a fix for some failing tests on riscv64. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1263671832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1263671832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LUhoY | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-09-30T14:47:06Z | 2022-09-30T14:47:06Z | MEMBER | I think the real solution here is to explicitly handle NaNs during the decoding step. We do want these to be NaT in the output. cc @spencerclark |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262836815 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262836815 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LRVxP | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-09-29T21:28:31Z | 2022-09-29T21:28:31Z | MEMBER | Thank you very much for the context @DocOtak ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262828844 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262828844 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LRT0s | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-09-29T21:22:32Z | 2022-09-29T21:22:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @TomNicholas Something different will need to happen with that cast eventually. See #6191 for something that is failing on some systems that users have but is currently unable to be captured in the tests. Numpy has already added runtime warnings about doing this, and is "thinking about" making nan to int casts raise https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/14412. Xarray's own @shoyer has hit issues like this before as well https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6109. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262637254 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262637254 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LQlDG | andreas-schwab 2175493 | 2022-09-29T18:08:29Z | 2022-09-29T18:08:29Z | NONE | That's the beauty of undefined behaviour. It comes in many flavors, and you never know which one you get. Which also means that it is impossible to reliably test for it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262579935 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262579935 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LQXDf | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-09-29T17:20:48Z | 2022-09-29T17:20:48Z | MEMBER |
Okay great, but then why are these tests failing for you (locally?) and not in our CI runs? (Our I'm asking because if our current CI test runs don't reproduce this error, then we (a) have no way to check that your change fixed the error and (b) will not know if some regression causes this error to resurface in future. Standard practice would be to raise an issue that demonstrates the problem, then link the fix PR to that issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262568339 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262568339 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LQUOT | andreas-schwab 2175493 | 2022-09-29T17:12:43Z | 2022-09-29T17:12:43Z | NONE | It's already perfectly covered by the testsuite. =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED xarray/tests/test_backends.py::TestScipyInMemoryData::test_roundtrip_numpy_datetime_data FAILED xarray/tests/test_backends.py::TestScipyFileObject::test_roundtrip_numpy_datetime_data FAILED xarray/tests/test_backends.py::TestGenericNetCDFData::test_roundtrip_numpy_datetime_data FAILED xarray/tests/test_backends.py::TestScipyFilePath::test_roundtrip_numpy_datetime_data = 4 failed, 4636 passed, 5632 skipped, 19 xfailed, 22 xpassed, 38 warnings in 266.18s (0:04:26) = |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1262537736 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262537736 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LQMwI | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-09-29T16:44:38Z | 2022-09-29T16:44:38Z | MEMBER | Hi @andreas-schwab, and welcome to xarray! Can you tell what specific failures this change fixed for you? If there was something failing we want to capture it in our test suite, but I am not sure what failure you are referring to. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5