issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 1363829843 and user = 14371165 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date)

user 1

  • Illviljan · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • list available backends and basic descriptors · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1244499083 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7000#issuecomment-1244499083 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7000 IC_kwDOAMm_X85KLYyL Illviljan 14371165 2022-09-12T21:22:31Z 2022-09-12T21:22:31Z MEMBER

My 2 cents is that list_engines should be good enough and the issue is the lack of a good repr on the backend classes.

If the dict repr from list_engines is still not good enough maybe replacing the dict with a custom MutableMapping with a good repr format could be a way forward?

 
{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   list available backends and basic descriptors 1363829843
1244125614 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7000#issuecomment-1244125614 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7000 IC_kwDOAMm_X85KJ9mu Illviljan 14371165 2022-09-12T18:21:05Z 2022-09-12T18:21:05Z MEMBER

```

xr.backends.plugins.list_engines() {'scipy': <xarray.backends.scipy_.ScipyBackendEntrypoint object at 0x101ec4ee0>, 'rasterio': <rioxarray.xarray_plugin.RasterioBackend object at 0x10217de70>, 'store': <xarray.backends.store.StoreBackendEntrypoint object at 0x10217de10>} ``` I wonder if these classes had a proper repr wouldn't that be enough?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   list available backends and basic descriptors 1363829843

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);