issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 1249350841 and user = 40182387 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix kwargs used for extrapolation in docs · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1141699498 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6639#issuecomment-1141699498 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6639 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85EDPOq | lstngr 40182387 | 2022-05-31T06:02:28Z | 2022-05-31T06:02:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you for the heads-up @Illviljan. Should be good now |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix kwargs used for extrapolation in docs 1249350841 | |
| 1140409653 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6639#issuecomment-1140409653 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6639 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85D-UU1 | lstngr 40182387 | 2022-05-29T09:17:49Z | 2022-05-29T09:17:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @pums974 You maybe have an opinion on the accuracy of this PR, since you originally implemented this behavior? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix kwargs used for extrapolation in docs 1249350841 | |
| 1139582688 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6639#issuecomment-1139582688 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6639 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85D7Kbg | lstngr 40182387 | 2022-05-27T12:41:56Z | 2022-05-27T12:41:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hopefully this looks better: it now states that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix kwargs used for extrapolation in docs 1249350841 | |
| 1138892993 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6639#issuecomment-1138892993 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6639 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85D4iDB | lstngr 40182387 | 2022-05-26T18:37:32Z | 2022-05-26T18:37:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Right now, the docstring only suggests different interpolation may be used depending on the input, but typically refers to "1-dimensional" vs "multi-dimensional" arrays. I would do it this way:
Does that look alright to you? |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix kwargs used for extrapolation in docs 1249350841 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1