issue_comments
11 rows where issue = 1223270563 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1124342119 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1124342119 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85DBBln | crusaderky 6213168 | 2022-05-11T22:12:24Z | 2022-05-11T22:12:24Z | MEMBER |
I think that's the context manager teardown, not the task counting |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1124302215 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1124302215 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85DA32H | shoyer 1217238 | 2022-05-11T21:15:36Z | 2022-05-11T21:15:36Z | MEMBER | For whatever reason, Windows seems to be much stricter about requiring file handles to be explicitly closed. So my guess is that this could be solved by using |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1124191155 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1124191155 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85DAcuz | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-05-11T19:10:04Z | 2022-05-11T19:10:04Z | MEMBER | Lets skip windows for now. @crusaderky this looks weird:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1124163546 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1124163546 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85DAV_a | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-05-11T18:37:24Z | 2022-05-11T18:37:24Z | MEMBER | For some reason counting the number of tasks in the dask graph via
I only need to do this in the test, so unless someone knows a more robust way to check the number of tasks in the task graph, I'll just add a skipif windows to the test. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1124053990 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1124053990 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85C_7Pm | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-05-11T17:31:55Z | 2022-05-11T17:31:55Z | MEMBER | We discussed this in the team meeting today.
I've added a test which simply counts the number of nodes in the dask graph and checks that it is smaller when
We decided False for now, and maybe switch it in a future PR
I'll just leave it as I think this can be merged? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1117499016 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1117499016 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Cm66I | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-05-04T15:34:48Z | 2022-05-04T15:34:48Z | MEMBER | @TomNicholas can you review and check that I didn't miss anything? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1117494543 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1117494543 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Cm50P | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-05-04T15:30:52Z | 2022-05-04T15:30:52Z | MEMBER | @dcherian thanks for the heads-up. #6559 has a recent enough version of dask, so if that gets merged then I can just pull it into this PR and avoid messing about with versions here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1117488755 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1117488755 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Cm4Zz | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-05-04T15:25:35Z | 2022-05-04T15:25:35Z | MEMBER |
See #6559 getting the env to work took some effort |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1117431444 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1117431444 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CmqaU | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-05-04T14:59:44Z | 2022-05-04T14:59:44Z | MEMBER | There is some discussion on the dask PR that added this feature about what the default value for the flag should be. They suggest that at least for datasets opened from zarr it might always be better to Tagging @shoyer because he had opinions in that dask PR discussion. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1117426567 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1117426567 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CmpOH | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2022-05-04T14:56:31Z | 2022-05-04T14:56:31Z | MEMBER | I think the test failure might be because our minimum dependencies CI uses |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 | |
1115292947 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6566#issuecomment-1115292947 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6566 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CegUT | rabernat 1197350 | 2022-05-02T19:46:06Z | 2022-05-02T19:46:06Z | MEMBER | Exposing this options seems like a great idea IMO. I'm not sure the best way to test this. I think the most basic test is just to make sure the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
New inline_array kwarg for open_dataset 1223270563 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5