issue_comments
10 rows where issue = 1052740367 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1012384997 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-1012384997 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848V8Tl | FabianHofmann 19226431 | 2022-01-13T18:10:57Z | 2022-01-13T18:10:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It was a pleasure! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
1012330030 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-1012330030 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848Vu4u | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-01-13T17:03:07Z | 2022-01-13T17:03:07Z | MEMBER | Thank you, @FabianHofmann ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
983858467 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-983858467 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846pH0j | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-12-01T17:19:12Z | 2021-12-01T17:19:12Z | MEMBER |
Sounds good to me then! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
983747745 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-983747745 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846osyh | mathause 10194086 | 2021-12-01T15:22:27Z | 2021-12-01T15:22:27Z | MEMBER | Any objections to merging this as is? If we don't disallow However, ```python xr.DataArray(da).data is da.data # True xr.DataArray(da.data).data is da.data # True whileda.copy().data is da.data # False (deep=True is the default) ``` might just be surprising in some situations. (Just for completeness - |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
979413036 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-979413036 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846YKgs | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-11-25T18:24:04Z | 2021-11-25T18:24:04Z | MEMBER |
Perfect, very much agree, thank you for the clear description @keewis ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
979283695 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-979283695 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846Xq7v | keewis 14808389 | 2021-11-25T15:00:59Z | 2021-11-25T15:00:59Z | MEMBER | for reference, the situation we already deprecated and removed was passing In contrast to that, I think we can keep However, this might make the constructor a bit more difficult to understand so if we don't think that's worth the (minor) inconvenience:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
979262832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-979262832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846Xl1w | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-11-25T14:31:53Z | 2021-11-25T14:31:53Z | MEMBER |
Does this mean |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
979096277 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-979096277 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846W9LV | mathause 10194086 | 2021-11-25T11:02:18Z | 2021-11-25T11:02:18Z | MEMBER |
Makes sense - how about:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
978014946 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-978014946 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846S1Li | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-11-24T16:04:01Z | 2021-11-24T16:04:01Z | MEMBER | How about we raise DeprecationWarning for now asking the user to pass in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 | |
977689446 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5984#issuecomment-977689446 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5984 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846Rltm | mathause 10194086 | 2021-11-24T09:23:14Z | 2021-11-24T09:23:14Z | MEMBER | @dcherian you had an opinion on this in #5983 - would you rather raise a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
preserve chunked data when creating DataArray from DataArray 1052740367 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 6