issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 1037894157 and user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
These facets timed out: author_association, issue
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
953351408 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5902#issuecomment-953351408 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5902 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8440vzw | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-27T22:16:17Z | 2021-10-27T22:18:33Z | MEMBER | (warning: untested code) Instead of looking at all of or alternatively make a list of multiindex variables names and exclude thosethen the condition becomesany(is_duck_dask_array(self.variables[v].data) for v in nonindexes) ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Slow performance of `DataArray.unstack()` from checking `variable.data` 1037894157 | |
953352129 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5902#issuecomment-953352129 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5902 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8440v_B | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-27T22:17:39Z | 2021-10-27T22:17:39Z | MEMBER | PS: It doesn't seem like the bottleneck in your case but #5582 has an alternative proposal for unstacking dask arrays. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Slow performance of `DataArray.unstack()` from checking `variable.data` 1037894157 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1