issue_comments

Table actions

5 rows where issue = 1029142676 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

author_association 2

issue 1

  • fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 · 5 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
949967686 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5875#issuecomment-949967686 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5875 IC_kwDOAMm_X844n1tG mathause 10194086 2021-10-22T21:24:09Z 2021-10-22T21:24:09Z MEMBER

Jup, let's merge. Thanks! 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 1029142676
949619003 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5875#issuecomment-949619003 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5875 IC_kwDOAMm_X844mgk7 Illviljan 14371165 2021-10-22T13:12:06Z 2021-10-22T13:12:06Z MEMBER

Looks good to me. Shall we merge?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 1029142676
947086397 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5875#issuecomment-947086397 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5875 IC_kwDOAMm_X844c2Q9 mathause 10194086 2021-10-19T20:37:43Z 2021-10-19T20:37:43Z MEMBER

Thanks for the feedback - so I suggest to merge soonish as this breaks the tests on main.

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 1029142676
945859209 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5875#issuecomment-945859209 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5875 IC_kwDOAMm_X844YKqJ barronh 1191149 2021-10-18T14:53:45Z 2021-10-18T14:53:45Z CONTRIBUTOR

This makes sense to me. These attributes more fully describe the independent variable. They were added due to a lack of clarity and to allow better unit handling on the independent variable. Thank you for updating the test.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 1029142676
945819717 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5875#issuecomment-945819717 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5875 IC_kwDOAMm_X844YBBF github-actions[bot] 41898282 2021-10-18T14:16:16Z 2021-10-18T14:16:16Z CONTRIBUTOR

Unit Test Results

6 files           6 suites   53m 22s :stopwatch: 16 230 tests 14 494 :heavy_check_mark: 1 736 :zzz: 0 :x: 90 576 runs  82 396 :heavy_check_mark: 8 180 :zzz: 0 :x:

Results for commit d72c3be1.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   fix test with pseudonetcdf 3.2 1029142676

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);