issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1028110240 and user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Generator for groupby reductions · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 962118284 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-962118284 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X845WMKM | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-11-05T18:22:56Z | 2021-11-05T18:22:56Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the reviews! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 | |
| 962075979 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-962075979 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X845WB1L | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-11-05T17:20:31Z | 2021-11-05T17:20:31Z | MEMBER |
:+1: I think we make this change project-wide if we want to do it (looks like pyupgrade supports it). @Illviljan can you open an issue please? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 | |
| 954959122 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-954959122 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84464US | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-29T18:26:19Z | 2021-10-29T18:26:19Z | MEMBER | All green! This should be good to go. Here are a couple of examples: https://xray--5871.org.readthedocs.build/en/5871/generated/xarray.core.groupby.DataArrayGroupBy.sum.html https://xray--5871.org.readthedocs.build/en/5871/generated/xarray.core.resample.DataArrayResample.sum.html |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 | |
| 950316866 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-950316866 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X844pK9C | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-24T12:30:40Z | 2021-10-24T12:30:40Z | MEMBER | It's ok to me. My hesitation is because we only need in a very small number of places IIUC. Happy to defer to the opinions of more experienced typers |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 | |
| 950295790 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-950295790 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X844pFzu | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-24T10:04:34Z | 2021-10-24T10:04:34Z | MEMBER | I think @keewis mentioned we could drop 3.7 in December which is not that far away. Can we type |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 | |
| 950181408 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5871#issuecomment-950181408 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5871 | IC_kwDOAMm_X844op4g | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-10-23T17:01:02Z | 2021-10-23T17:01:02Z | MEMBER | Updated to generate resample reductions separately. This allows us to have nice examples in the docstring. I'm having trouble with mypy though. Please help!
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generator for groupby reductions 1028110240 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1