issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 100646364 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
These facets timed out: author_association, issue
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 137871954 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-137871954 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNzg3MTk1NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-04T22:35:11Z | 2015-09-04T22:35:11Z | MEMBER | I haven't been very careful about insisting on a clean git history so far, so don't worry about rebase/squash. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | |
| 137869341 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-137869341 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNzg2OTM0MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-04T22:19:10Z | 2015-09-04T22:19:10Z | MEMBER | I think this is pretty much good to go. Merge at your discretion! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | |
| 137811989 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-137811989 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNzgxMTk4OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-04T18:22:48Z | 2015-09-04T18:22:48Z | MEMBER | For the simple example in the doc -- use imshow instead of contourf? The result is definitely more aesthetically pleasing:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | |
| 137598575 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-137598575 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNzU5ODU3NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-03T23:13:01Z | 2015-09-03T23:13:01Z | MEMBER | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | ||
| 137282470 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-137282470 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNzI4MjQ3MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-03T00:36:16Z | 2015-09-03T00:36:16Z | MEMBER | @clarkfitzg was that second plot supposed to be different? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | |
| 136881281 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-136881281 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNjg4MTI4MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-01T22:27:25Z | 2015-09-01T22:27:25Z | MEMBER | @clarkfitzg Is that something that can fixed simply by adjusting the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 | |
| 136848233 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/527#issuecomment-136848233 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzNjg0ODIzMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-09-01T20:17:24Z | 2015-09-01T20:17:53Z | MEMBER | Skipping the missing block looks pretty nice to me! I'm pretty happy with the aesthetics, though there's a case for copying the behavior from Seaborn, e.g.,
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
faceted plots 100646364 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);


user 1