issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 712189206 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preprocess function for save_mfdataset · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
702307334 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702307334 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjMwNzMzNA== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | NONE | Sounds good, I'll do this in the meantime. Still quite interested in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
702265883 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702265883 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjI2NTg4Mw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | NONE | Multiple threads (the default), because it's recommended "for numeric code that releases the GIL (like NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-Learn, Numba, …)" according to the dask docs. I guess I could do multi-threaded for the compute part (everything up to the definition of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
702178407 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702178407 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjE3ODQwNw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | NONE | Thank you, this works for me. However, it's quite slow and seems to scale faster than linearly as the length of Could it be connected to https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2912#issuecomment-485497398 where they suggest to use Appreciate the help! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
701676076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701676076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTY3NjA3Ng== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | NONE | Unfortunately that doesn't work:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1