issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 712189206 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preprocess function for save_mfdataset · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 702307334 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702307334 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjMwNzMzNA== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | NONE | Sounds good, I'll do this in the meantime. Still quite interested in |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702265883 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702265883 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjI2NTg4Mw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | NONE | Multiple threads (the default), because it's recommended "for numeric code that releases the GIL (like NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-Learn, Numba, …)" according to the dask docs. I guess I could do multi-threaded for the compute part (everything up to the definition of |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702178407 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702178407 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjE3ODQwNw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | NONE | Thank you, this works for me. However, it's quite slow and seems to scale faster than linearly as the length of Could it be connected to https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2912#issuecomment-485497398 where they suggest to use Appreciate the help! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 701676076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701676076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTY3NjA3Ng== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | NONE | Unfortunately that doesn't work:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1