issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 712189206 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Preprocess function for save_mfdataset · 9 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 702307334 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702307334 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjMwNzMzNA== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | 2020-10-01T18:07:55Z | NONE | Sounds good, I'll do this in the meantime. Still quite interested in |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702276824 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702276824 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjI3NjgyNA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-10-01T17:13:16Z | 2020-10-01T17:13:16Z | MEMBER |
I think so. I would try multiple processes and see if that is fast enough for what you want to do. Or else, write to zarr. This will be parallelized and is a lot easier than dealing with HDF5 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702265883 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702265883 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjI2NTg4Mw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | 2020-10-01T16:52:59Z | NONE | Multiple threads (the default), because it's recommended "for numeric code that releases the GIL (like NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-Learn, Numba, …)" according to the dask docs. I guess I could do multi-threaded for the compute part (everything up to the definition of |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702226256 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702226256 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjIyNjI1Ng== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-10-01T15:46:45Z | 2020-10-01T15:46:45Z | MEMBER | Are you using multiple threads or multiple processes? IIUC you should be using multiple processes for max writing efficiency. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 702178407 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-702178407 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMjE3ODQwNw== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | 2020-10-01T14:34:28Z | NONE | Thank you, this works for me. However, it's quite slow and seems to scale faster than linearly as the length of Could it be connected to https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2912#issuecomment-485497398 where they suggest to use Appreciate the help! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 701694586 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701694586 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTY5NDU4Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-09-30T23:13:33Z | 2020-09-30T23:13:33Z | MEMBER | I think we could support delayed objects in result = [dask.delayed(write_dataset)(ds, path) for ds, path in zip(datasets, path)] dask.compute(result) ``` |
{
"total_count": 3,
"+1": 3,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 701688956 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701688956 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTY4ODk1Ng== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-09-30T22:55:28Z | 2020-09-30T22:55:28Z | MEMBER | You could write to netCDF in I guess this is a good argument for adding a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 701676076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701676076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTY3NjA3Ng== | heerad 2560426 | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | 2020-09-30T22:17:24Z | NONE | Unfortunately that doesn't work:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 | |
| 701577652 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4475#issuecomment-701577652 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4475 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwMTU3NzY1Mg== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-09-30T18:51:25Z | 2020-09-30T18:51:25Z | MEMBER | you could use
I think this will work, but I've never used |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Preprocess function for save_mfdataset 712189206 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3