issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 662505658 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1267571723 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-1267571723 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LjZwL | mullenkamp 2656596 | 2022-10-04T20:58:37Z | 2022-10-04T21:00:08Z | NONE | Running |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
| 1258874354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-1258874354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LCOXy | brianmapes 2086210 | 2022-09-27T02:14:28Z | 2022-09-27T02:14:28Z | NONE | +1 Complicated, still vexing this user a year+ later, but it easier for me to just restart the kernel again and again than read this and #4879, which is closed but didn't seem to have succeeded if I read correctly? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
| 676326130 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-676326130 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NjMyNjEzMA== | markusritschel 3332539 | 2020-08-19T13:07:05Z | 2020-08-19T13:07:05Z | NONE | Would it be an option to consider the time stamp of the file's last change as a caching criterion? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
| 663791784 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663791784 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5MTc4NA== | michaelaye 69774 | 2020-07-25T01:41:20Z | 2020-07-25T01:41:20Z | NONE | now i'm wondering why the caching logic is only activated by the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
| 663791386 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663791386 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5MTM4Ng== | michaelaye 69774 | 2020-07-25T01:37:20Z | 2020-07-25T01:37:20Z | NONE | is there a workaround for forcing the opening without restarting the notebook? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4