issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 662505658 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1267571723 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-1267571723 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LjZwL | mullenkamp 2656596 | 2022-10-04T20:58:37Z | 2022-10-04T21:00:08Z | NONE | Running |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
1258874354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-1258874354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LCOXy | brianmapes 2086210 | 2022-09-27T02:14:28Z | 2022-09-27T02:14:28Z | NONE | +1 Complicated, still vexing this user a year+ later, but it easier for me to just restart the kernel again and again than read this and #4879, which is closed but didn't seem to have succeeded if I read correctly? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
774774033 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-774774033 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NDc3NDAzMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2021-02-07T21:48:38Z | 2021-02-07T21:48:38Z | MEMBER | I have a tentative fix for this in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879. It would be great if someone could give this a try to verify that it resolve the issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
764726612 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-764726612 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NDcyNjYxMg== | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2021-01-21T15:34:42Z | 2021-01-21T15:46:36Z | MEMBER | I've stumbled over this weird behaviour many times and was wondering why this happens. So AFAICT @shoyer hit the nail on the head but the root cause is that the Dataset is added to the notebook namespace somehow, if one just evaluates it in the cell. This doesn't happen if you invoke the
I've forced myself to use either
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
676326130 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-676326130 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NjMyNjEzMA== | markusritschel 3332539 | 2020-08-19T13:07:05Z | 2020-08-19T13:07:05Z | NONE | Would it be an option to consider the time stamp of the file's last change as a caching criterion? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
663794065 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663794065 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5NDA2NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-07-25T02:05:18Z | 2020-07-25T02:05:18Z | MEMBER | Probably the easiest work around is to call I believe it only gets activated by |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
663791784 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663791784 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5MTc4NA== | michaelaye 69774 | 2020-07-25T01:41:20Z | 2020-07-25T01:41:20Z | NONE | now i'm wondering why the caching logic is only activated by the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
663791386 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663791386 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5MTM4Ng== | michaelaye 69774 | 2020-07-25T01:37:20Z | 2020-07-25T01:37:20Z | NONE | is there a workaround for forcing the opening without restarting the notebook? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 | |
663790991 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4240#issuecomment-663790991 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4240 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2Mzc5MDk5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-07-25T01:33:36Z | 2020-07-25T01:33:36Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the clear example! This happens dues to xarray's caching logic for files: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/b1c7e315e8a18e86c5751a0aa9024d41a42ca5e8/xarray/backends/file_manager.py#L50-L76 This means that when you open the same filename, xarray doesn't actually reopen the file from disk -- instead it points to the same file object already cached in memory. I can see why this could be confusing. We do need this caching logic for files opened from the same |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
jupyter repr caching deleted netcdf file 662505658 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 6