home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

2 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 484240082 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

  • tacaswell 1
  • khaeru 1

issue 1

  • sparse and other duck array issues · 2 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
780798734 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3245#issuecomment-780798734 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3245 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDc5ODczNA== tacaswell 199813 2021-02-17T19:33:05Z 2021-02-17T19:33:05Z NONE

Is there any motion on this? This come up in relation to akward array today (see https://github.com/scikit-hep/awkward-1.0/issues/749 ).

If xarray goes with the to_numpy spelling as well then all of {pandas, xarray, akwardarray} have the same spelling which is nice from the Matplotlib side of things.

I think the as_ vs to_ distinction the "to_" makes more sense as it gets you out of xarray land and drops you back to raw numpy land.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  sparse and other duck array issues 484240082
539215442 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3245#issuecomment-539215442 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3245 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzOTIxNTQ0Mg== khaeru 1634164 2019-10-07T21:37:53Z 2019-10-07T21:37:53Z NONE

As far as I can tell, the proposal here will require either python s = pd.Series(...) xr.DataArray.from_series(s).to_series() or: python xr.DataArray.from_series(s, sparse=True).to_dense().to_series()

For any code that can't guarantee sparse/non-sparse input, the first will fail sometimes, so it will always be necessary to write the latter everywhere, which IMO is unnecessarily verbose.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  sparse and other duck array issues 484240082

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 28.194ms · About: xarray-datasette