home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 780798734

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3245#issuecomment-780798734 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3245 780798734 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDc5ODczNA== 199813 2021-02-17T19:33:05Z 2021-02-17T19:33:05Z NONE

Is there any motion on this? This come up in relation to akward array today (see https://github.com/scikit-hep/awkward-1.0/issues/749 ).

If xarray goes with the to_numpy spelling as well then all of {pandas, xarray, akwardarray} have the same spelling which is nice from the Matplotlib side of things.

I think the as_ vs to_ distinction the "to_" makes more sense as it gets you out of xarray land and drops you back to raw numpy land.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  484240082
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.018ms · About: xarray-datasette