issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 98274024 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
126851008 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126851008 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjg1MTAwOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-08-01T02:22:59Z | 2015-08-01T02:22:59Z | MEMBER | I moved the docs around and added a note on multi-dimensional indexing. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria 98274024 | |
126815158 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126815158 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjgxNTE1OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-31T21:22:36Z | 2015-07-31T21:22:36Z | MEMBER | Oh, wow -- I didn't even realize that worked in pandas! Combined with NA-skipping aggregation functions in pandas that makes expressions like So instead of adding The main difference is that Currently, (1) and (3) work by selection. If we adopt the pandas behavior, (4) would also work, but by broadcasting and masking. This seems like a potential recipe for confusion, because once you have (4), case (2) seems like a natural variation. We could implement (2), but should it mask or select? My sense is that we'll probably be happier if we have entirely distinct APIs for masking ( |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria 98274024 | |
126784623 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126784623 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjc4NDYyMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-31T18:58:16Z | 2015-07-31T18:58:16Z | MEMBER |
The problem is that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria 98274024 | |
126772960 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126772960 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjc3Mjk2MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-31T18:05:22Z | 2015-07-31T18:10:59Z | MEMBER | Right now, you can do that by chaining two operations: I suppose we could also support |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria 98274024 | |
126770381 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126770381 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjc3MDM4MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z | 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z | MEMBER | @clarkfitzg Yes, that's mostly right. The main differences:
1. The order of the arguments here is different, to match the pandas methods (which has more of a SQL flavor to it).
2. I'm not exposing the third argument, because xray objects don't yet implement broadcasting operations with more than 2 arguments at once. This is something that needs refactoring -- the logic in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: where method for masking xray objects according to some criteria 98274024 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1