home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 126770381

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126770381 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 126770381 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjc3MDM4MQ== 1217238 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z MEMBER

@clarkfitzg Yes, that's mostly right. The main differences: 1. The order of the arguments here is different, to match the pandas methods (which has more of a SQL flavor to it). 2. I'm not exposing the third argument, because xray objects don't yet implement broadcasting operations with more than 2 arguments at once. This is something that needs refactoring -- the logic in _binary_op should be generalized to any number of arguments.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  98274024
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.633ms · About: xarray-datasette