issue_comments: 126770381
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/504#issuecomment-126770381 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/504 | 126770381 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNjc3MDM4MQ== | 1217238 | 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z | 2015-07-31T17:51:49Z | MEMBER | @clarkfitzg Yes, that's mostly right. The main differences:
1. The order of the arguments here is different, to match the pandas methods (which has more of a SQL flavor to it).
2. I'm not exposing the third argument, because xray objects don't yet implement broadcasting operations with more than 2 arguments at once. This is something that needs refactoring -- the logic in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
98274024 |