issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 974659059 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Added get_options method · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
902286066 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5716#issuecomment-902286066 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5716 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841x8ry | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-08-19T22:13:32Z | 2021-08-19T22:13:32Z | MEMBER | This looks good., thanks @pkopparla Thanks for reviewing @Illviljan . Agree re a test — at least to just test it runs, albeit trivial.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added get_options method 974659059 | |
902010417 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5716#issuecomment-902010417 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5716 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841w5Yx | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-08-19T15:27:44Z | 2021-08-19T15:27:44Z | MEMBER | The returned dict should be read only, otherwise you can bypass all the validation checks that's done in We probably need to make sure that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added get_options method 974659059 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2