issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 840258082 and user = 226037 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- `lock` kwarg needs a deprecation cycle? · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
831700309 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5073#issuecomment-831700309 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5073 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMTcwMDMwOQ== | alexamici 226037 | 2021-05-04T05:57:19Z | 2021-05-04T05:57:19Z | MEMBER | Sorry for being so late to the party! I thought @aurghs did respond to this issue and forgot about it. What has happened is not that The main difference is that The solution is to in fact only advertise the deprecation for those backends in my opinion as the functionality is legit for most of the backends. Sorry again for seeing this so late. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`lock` kwarg needs a deprecation cycle? 840258082 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1