issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 741115905 and user = 14808389 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

These facets timed out: author_association, issue

user 1

  • keewis · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
727068025 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4574#issuecomment-727068025 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4574 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyNzA2ODAyNQ== keewis 14808389 2020-11-13T22:32:25Z 2020-11-13T22:49:49Z MEMBER

yeah, that makes the CI somewhat less useful. allow_failure is used for silencing the error code of pytest: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/dd9fe2a8a414ddefa3b04b934163c9ccc628c5c7/ci/azure/unit-tests.yml#L14-L18

Not sure if that would make a difference, but maybe we should try using continueOnError instead?

Edit: we could also try to print a warning if the CI fails: yaml - bash: | $(environment_variables) pytest \ --junitxml=junit/test-results.xml \ --cov=xarray \ --cov-report=xml \ $(pytest_extra_flags) \ || ([ "$ALLOW_FAILURE" = "true" ] && echo -e "\043#vso[task.logissue type=warning;] ignored CI failure!!") see docs for the format of these messages. It seems they are supposed to be visible in the status report of github.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   nightly upstream test 741115905
725701318 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4574#issuecomment-725701318 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4574 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyNTcwMTMxOA== keewis 14808389 2020-11-11T22:40:52Z 2020-11-11T22:40:52Z MEMBER

I think github actions have the option to send notifications for failed CI, so those who have that enabled would have to open an issue. Ideally, however, the failed action would automatically open a issue with a generic title (something like "nightly upstream-dev CI failed") and the build log (maybe trimmed to just the error logs?). Not sure if that is possible right now, though.

When thinking about this after we ended the call, I realized we would actually be losing a bit of coverage: what happens if we remove the upstream-dev CI for PRs and a PR introduces changes incompatible with upstream-dev? We would definitely catch that using the nightly CI, but only after merging.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   nightly upstream test 741115905

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);