issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 626083981 and user = 14808389 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- cache rasterio example files · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
805297291 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-805297291 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwNTI5NzI5MQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2021-03-23T22:04:56Z | 2021-03-23T22:04:56Z | MEMBER | data versioning might be useful if we ever decide to change datasets: once we do, the examples would change as well, so people might not be able to exactly reproduce them. Not sure how much of an issue that is, though. I fixed the failing tests, but the trick I used (point |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
761708024 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-761708024 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MTcwODAyNA== | keewis 14808389 | 2021-01-17T00:58:49Z | 2021-01-17T00:58:49Z | MEMBER | I switched the tutorial code to use However, So for now, instead of using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
723319721 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-723319721 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzMxOTcyMQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-06T22:02:02Z | 2020-11-06T22:02:02Z | MEMBER | what should we do with this? Maybe it's easier to decide if we split this PR into one that introduces the caching and a new one that tries to find the correct "appdirs" path (which I think is nice to have but not really important)? |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
651438011 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-651438011 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTQzODAxMQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-06-30T00:19:46Z | 2020-06-30T00:19:46Z | MEMBER | I vendored |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
651217367 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-651217367 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTIxNzM2Nw== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-06-29T16:09:25Z | 2020-06-29T16:09:25Z | MEMBER | thanks for pointing me to that issue, @dcherian |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
651062460 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-651062460 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTA2MjQ2MA== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-06-29T11:45:39Z | 2020-06-29T13:23:24Z | MEMBER |
When writing this I wanted to make sure we didn't force a After looking into this a bit more, it seems we would probably need to have different cache folders for different platforms:
- on windows, the path is given by So a currently released version of How closely should we follow those specifications? Edit: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
636841900 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-636841900 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjg0MTkwMA== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-06-01T12:48:13Z | 2020-06-01T14:01:55Z | MEMBER | using a existing library for that instead of writing our own caching / downloading functions does seem useful (the code there seems to be much more sophisticated than anything in the We could also make it a optional dependency, but that would mean that the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1