issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 453964049 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix 'to_masked_array' computing dask arrays twice · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 505531367 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3006#issuecomment-505531367 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3006 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNTUzMTM2Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-25T16:56:19Z | 2019-06-25T16:56:19Z | MEMBER | hopefully out this week! I am going to wait another day or two for someone else to look at https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3040/ and then will probably be issuing a release. |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 1,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix 'to_masked_array' computing dask arrays twice 453964049 | |
| 500411377 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3006#issuecomment-500411377 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3006 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMDQxMTM3Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-10T13:12:37Z | 2019-06-10T13:12:37Z | MEMBER | @djhoese It looks like something broke in the development version of dask. But that shouldn't hold up merging your fix here... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix 'to_masked_array' computing dask arrays twice 453964049 | |
| 500290315 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3006#issuecomment-500290315 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3006 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMDI5MDMxNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-10T04:46:57Z | 2019-06-10T04:46:57Z | MEMBER | I'd be happy to merge this fix. I think it's a vestige of when we used to always cached computations. I'd also love to have more comprehensive test coverage, and I like the look of your custom scheduler. But I'm not sure it's worth adding that many lines of test logic for what is essentially a one line fix. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix 'to_masked_array' computing dask arrays twice 453964049 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1