issue_comments
15 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 391477755 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Added Coarsen · 15 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
451726877 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-451726877 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTcyNjg3Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-01-06T09:13:56Z | 2019-01-06T09:13:56Z | MEMBER | Indeed, thank you @fujiisoup ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
451421221 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-451421221 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTQyMTIyMQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2019-01-04T11:36:00Z | 2019-01-04T11:36:00Z | MEMBER | This is (one more time) an extremely useful addition to xarray - thanks so much @fujiisoup ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
451350667 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-451350667 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTM1MDY2Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-01-04T04:22:18Z | 2019-01-04T04:22:18Z | MEMBER | I plan to merge this tomorrow unless anyone else has further suggestions. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
449220785 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-449220785 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTIyMDc4NQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-12-21T02:35:49Z | 2018-12-21T02:35:49Z | MEMBER | +1, on |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
449214046 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-449214046 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTIxNDA0Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-12-21T02:00:53Z | 2018-12-21T02:00:53Z | MEMBER | @pydata/xarray any opinions on what the default value for the Personally, I like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
449158415 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-449158415 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE1ODQxNQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-12-20T22:38:19Z | 2018-12-20T22:39:20Z | MEMBER | During writing the test codes, I realized that the default The down side of this is that it can make a uniformly spaced data an inhomogeneously spaced one.
It is something what users may not expect.
(probably |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
449142367 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-449142367 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE0MjM2Nw== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-12-20T21:33:22Z | 2018-12-20T21:33:22Z | MEMBER | Updated.
The main change is
1. API updated to
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
448721612 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448721612 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcyMTYxMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-12-19T19:48:02Z | 2018-12-19T19:48:02Z | MEMBER | I do think it would be nice for |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
448719698 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448719698 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcxOTY5OA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-12-19T19:41:53Z | 2018-12-19T19:41:53Z | MEMBER | Perfect, thanks for pointing that out (I've generally been a bit out of the loop recently...) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
448718248 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448718248 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcxODI0OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-12-19T19:37:09Z | 2018-12-19T19:37:09Z | MEMBER | @max-sixty we discussed this a little bit: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2525#issuecomment-434477550 The main difference is that resample is coordinate based, whereas this is integer position based which makes the implementation considerably simpler. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
448717771 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448717771 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcxNzc3MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-12-19T19:35:29Z | 2018-12-19T19:35:29Z | MEMBER |
Thanks. If this is multi-dimensional resampling / rolling, could we implement this functionality within those methods, enabling multiple dimensions? Potentially the implementations are different enough that the arguments don't have enough overlap? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
447924905 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-447924905 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NzkyNDkwNQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-12-17T17:17:18Z | 2018-12-17T17:17:18Z | MEMBER | @max-sixty I think it's multi-dimensional resampling / rolling. resample & rolling operate one dimension at a time. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
447912054 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-447912054 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NzkxMjA1NA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-12-17T16:41:58Z | 2018-12-17T16:41:58Z | MEMBER | Forgive me if this has an obvious answer: to what extent is this downsampling? Could this be done with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
447736226 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-447736226 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NzczNjIyNg== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-12-17T06:27:35Z | 2018-12-17T06:27:35Z | MEMBER | @dcherian Thanks.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 | |
447664380 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-447664380 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NzY2NDM4MA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-12-16T18:18:55Z | 2018-12-16T18:18:55Z | MEMBER |
Or we could default to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added Coarsen 391477755 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 6