issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 373121666 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint · 8 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 481222036 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-481222036 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTIyMjAzNg== | rabernat 1197350 | 2019-04-09T12:02:01Z | 2019-04-09T12:02:01Z | MEMBER | This works with latest libraries. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 453866603 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-453866603 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Mzg2NjYwMw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-13T21:20:51Z | 2019-01-13T21:20:51Z | MEMBER | @rabernat - do think this was resolved? If I'm understanding the thread correctly, it seems this was a libnetcdf version issue. Feel free to reopen if I've got that wrong. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432645477 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432645477 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjY0NTQ3Nw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-24T13:01:00Z | 2018-10-24T13:01:00Z | MEMBER | I created a binderized version of this issue with the latest dev xarray and fresh installs of all other packages: https://github.com/rabernat/pangeo_esgf_demo It appears to work fine! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432483817 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432483817 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQ4MzgxNw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-24T01:56:10Z | 2018-10-24T01:56:10Z | MEMBER | ``` $ conda list libnetcdf packages in environment at /opt/conda:Name Version Build Channellibnetcdf 4.6.1 h10edf3e_1 defaults ``` |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432416210 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432416210 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQxNjIxMA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-10-23T20:55:57Z | 2018-10-23T20:55:57Z | MEMBER | @rabernat have you tried using the development version of xarray? I think we fixed a few serialization/ netCDF4 bugs with the backends refactor. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432390876 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432390876 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM5MDg3Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-23T19:41:41Z | 2018-10-23T19:41:41Z | MEMBER | @rsignell-usgs - are you able to tell if multiple processes (workers) have authenticated on the server side? I think this detail would really help us isolate the problem. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432355234 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432355234 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM1NTIzNA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-23T18:01:39Z | 2018-10-23T18:01:39Z | MEMBER | This is fairly high priority for me, as it relates to the ongoing project to access CMIP6 data from an ESGF node running in google cloud (https://github.com/pangeo-data/pangeo/issues/420). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
| 432354151 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432354151 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM1NDE1MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-23T17:58:46Z | 2018-10-23T17:58:46Z | MEMBER | I'm wondering if there is some authentication that is not being properly distributed to the workers. I'm not actually sure how opendap works in this case. Perhaps @dopplershift has some ideas here? Has anyone, maybe @rsignell-usgs, used the kubernetes cluster with opendap endpoints? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3