issue_comments
26 rows where issue = 373121666 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint · 26 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
481222036 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-481222036 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTIyMjAzNg== | rabernat 1197350 | 2019-04-09T12:02:01Z | 2019-04-09T12:02:01Z | MEMBER | This works with latest libraries. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
453866603 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-453866603 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Mzg2NjYwMw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-13T21:20:51Z | 2019-01-13T21:20:51Z | MEMBER | @rabernat - do think this was resolved? If I'm understanding the thread correctly, it seems this was a libnetcdf version issue. Feel free to reopen if I've got that wrong. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432796835 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432796835 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc5NjgzNQ== | ocefpaf 950575 | 2018-10-24T19:29:11Z | 2018-10-24T19:29:11Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
There are many variables at play here. The env that solved it in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432645477 seems quite different from the env where the problem happened, including an |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432788686 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432788686 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc4ODY4Ng== | jjhelmus 1050278 | 2018-10-24T19:04:44Z | 2018-10-24T19:04:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | h10edf3e_1 contains the timeout fix and is build against hdf5 1.10.2. The |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432784219 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432784219 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc4NDIxOQ== | ocefpaf 950575 | 2018-10-24T18:53:22Z | 2018-10-24T18:53:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks @jjhelmus! I guess that info and https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432483817 eliminates the timeout issue from the equation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432783232 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432783232 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc4MzIzMg== | jjhelmus 1050278 | 2018-10-24T18:50:48Z | 2018-10-24T18:50:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | In |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432747410 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432747410 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0NzQxMA== | dopplershift 221526 | 2018-10-24T17:13:14Z | 2018-10-24T17:13:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Oh, I didn't even catch that the original was on defaults. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432746421 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432746421 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0NjQyMQ== | ocefpaf 950575 | 2018-10-24T17:10:44Z | 2018-10-24T17:10:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I know that @jjhelmus ported the fix to He can probably say more about that. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432744441 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432744441 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0NDQ0MQ== | dopplershift 221526 | 2018-10-24T17:06:01Z | 2018-10-24T17:06:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That version has the fix for the issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432743208 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432743208 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0MzIwOA== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-24T17:02:34Z | 2018-10-24T17:02:34Z | NONE | The version that is working in @rabernat's esgf binder env is:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432739449 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432739449 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjczOTQ0OQ== | dopplershift 221526 | 2018-10-24T16:54:05Z | 2018-10-24T16:54:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The original version of libnetcdf in @rabernat 's environment definitely had the opendap timeout issue. Not sure if that's the root cause of the problem, or not, but it's suspect. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432706068 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432706068 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjcwNjA2OA== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-24T15:27:33Z | 2018-10-24T15:27:33Z | NONE | I fired up my notebook on @rabernat's binder env and it worked fine also: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/gist/rsignell-usgs/aebdac44a1d773b99673cb132c2ef5eb |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432645477 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432645477 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjY0NTQ3Nw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-24T13:01:00Z | 2018-10-24T13:01:00Z | MEMBER | I created a binderized version of this issue with the latest dev xarray and fresh installs of all other packages: https://github.com/rabernat/pangeo_esgf_demo It appears to work fine! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432483817 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432483817 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQ4MzgxNw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-24T01:56:10Z | 2018-10-24T01:56:10Z | MEMBER | ``` $ conda list libnetcdf packages in environment at /opt/conda:Name Version Build Channellibnetcdf 4.6.1 h10edf3e_1 defaults ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432422763 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432422763 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQyMjc2Mw== | dopplershift 221526 | 2018-10-23T21:16:05Z | 2018-10-23T21:16:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @lesserwhirls That's an interesting idea. (@rsignell-usgs That's the one.) @rabernat What version of the conda-forge libnetcdf package is deployed wherever you're running? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432416210 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432416210 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQxNjIxMA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-10-23T20:55:57Z | 2018-10-23T20:55:57Z | MEMBER | @rabernat have you tried using the development version of xarray? I think we fixed a few serialization/ netCDF4 bugs with the backends refactor. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432416114 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432416114 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQxNjExNA== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-23T20:55:42Z | 2018-10-23T20:55:42Z | NONE | @lesserwhirls , is this the issue you are referring to? https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/836 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432415704 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432415704 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjQxNTcwNA== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-23T20:54:24Z | 2018-10-23T20:54:24Z | NONE | @jhamman, doesn't this dask status plot tell us that multiple workers are connecting and getting data?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432396648 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432396648 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM5NjY0OA== | lesserwhirls 67096 | 2018-10-23T19:59:30Z | 2018-10-23T19:59:30Z | NONE |
The "short time period" makes me wonder...@dopplershift - could this be due to the netCDF-C / curl timeout issue you mentioned today? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432390876 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432390876 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM5MDg3Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-23T19:41:41Z | 2018-10-23T19:41:41Z | MEMBER | @rsignell-usgs - are you able to tell if multiple processes (workers) have authenticated on the server side? I think this detail would really help us isolate the problem. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432389980 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432389980 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM4OTk4MA== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-23T19:39:09Z | 2018-10-23T19:39:09Z | NONE | Perhaps it's also worth mentioning that I don't see any errors on the THREDDS server side on either the tomcat catalina or thredds threddsServlet logs. @lesserwhirls, any ideas? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432374559 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432374559 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM3NDU1OQ== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-23T18:53:28Z | 2018-10-23T19:39:08Z | NONE | FWIW, in my workflow there was nothing fundamentally wrong, meaning that the requests worked for a while, but eventually would die with the So for just a short time period (in this case 50 time steps, 2 chunks in time), it would usually work: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/gist/rsignell-usgs/1155c76ed3440858ced8132e4cd81df4 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432367931 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432367931 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM2NzkzMQ== | rsignell-usgs 1872600 | 2018-10-23T18:34:48Z | 2018-10-23T19:18:52Z | NONE | I tried a similar workflow last week with an AWS kubernetes cluster with opendap endpoints and it also failed: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/gist/rsignell-usgs/8583ea8f8b5e1c926b0409bd536095a9 I thought it was likely some intermittent problem that wasn't handled well. In my case after a while I get:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432370887 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432370887 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM3MDg4Nw== | dopplershift 221526 | 2018-10-23T18:43:23Z | 2018-10-23T18:43:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Just so I'm clear on how the workflow looks: 1. Open dataset with NetCDF/OPeNDAP 2. Serialize NetCDFDataStore (pickle? netcdf file?) 3. Ship to Dask workers 4. Reconstitute NetCDFDataStore Certainly does seem like there's something stale in what the remote workers are getting. Confused why it works for the others, though. I can prioritize this a bit and dig in to see what I can figure out--though I'm teaching through tomorrow. May be able to dig into this while at ECMWF. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432355234 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432355234 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM1NTIzNA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-10-23T18:01:39Z | 2018-10-23T18:01:39Z | MEMBER | This is fairly high priority for me, as it relates to the ongoing project to access CMIP6 data from an ESGF node running in google cloud (https://github.com/pangeo-data/pangeo/issues/420). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 | |
432354151 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2503#issuecomment-432354151 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjM1NDE1MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-23T17:58:46Z | 2018-10-23T17:58:46Z | MEMBER | I'm wondering if there is some authentication that is not being properly distributed to the workers. I'm not actually sure how opendap works in this case. Perhaps @dopplershift has some ideas here? Has anyone, maybe @rsignell-usgs, used the kubernetes cluster with opendap endpoints? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Problems with distributed and opendap netCDF endpoint 373121666 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 8