issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 354324342 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
422535898 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-422535898 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjUzNTg5OA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-09-18T20:14:04Z | 2018-09-18T20:14:04Z | MEMBER | Thank you v much @jsignell ! Both for the excellent code and for bearing with the changes! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
422473891 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-422473891 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjQ3Mzg5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-09-18T17:10:46Z | 2018-09-18T17:10:46Z | MEMBER | If we're all happy with copy (which I think we are), then this should be good to go! |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
421177555 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-421177555 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMTE3NzU1NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-09-13T22:53:32Z | 2018-09-13T22:53:32Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
421171894 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-421171894 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMTE3MTg5NA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-09-13T22:23:43Z | 2018-09-13T22:23:43Z | MEMBER | how about + dataarray_like / variable_like + copy_labels ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
421171706 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-421171706 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMTE3MTcwNg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-09-13T22:22:44Z | 2018-09-13T22:22:44Z | MEMBER | Sorry I'm late to the party here. @jsignell thank you for the PR! Pandas has something similar: the Ambitious suggestion: given that we already create shallow copies when copying, could Less ambitious: I'd vote to have this as a method. I'm generally partial to methods given their discoverability and namespaces-without-cost. I think the context is clear. OTOH there is precedent with Naming: I'd vote That said, given my timing, I'd understand if we go forward as-is |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
419480046 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-419480046 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTQ4MDA0Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-09-07T15:40:53Z | 2018-09-07T15:40:53Z | MEMBER | More ideas:
- |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
419476614 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-419476614 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTQ3NjYxNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-09-07T15:29:40Z | 2018-09-07T15:29:40Z | MEMBER | What about a DataArray method called We could also make a more general |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 | |
419318366 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-419318366 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTMxODM2Ng== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-09-07T04:22:18Z | 2018-09-07T04:22:41Z | MEMBER | LGTM. I'm not a big fan of the name though, but I can't think of a better one. I wonder if we should have Also, this needs additions to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adding data kwarg to copy to create new objects with same structure as original 354324342 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4