issue_comments: 421171706
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2384#issuecomment-421171706 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2384 | 421171706 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMTE3MTcwNg== | 5635139 | 2018-09-13T22:22:44Z | 2018-09-13T22:22:44Z | MEMBER | Sorry I'm late to the party here. @jsignell thank you for the PR! Pandas has something similar: the Ambitious suggestion: given that we already create shallow copies when copying, could Less ambitious: I'd vote to have this as a method. I'm generally partial to methods given their discoverability and namespaces-without-cost. I think the context is clear. OTOH there is precedent with Naming: I'd vote That said, given my timing, I'd understand if we go forward as-is |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
354324342 |