home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 350899839 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: updated_at (date)

These facets timed out: author_association

user 1

  • shoyer · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • Let's list all the netCDF files that xarray can't open · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
419212304 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2368#issuecomment-419212304 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2368 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTIxMjMwNA== shoyer 1217238 2018-09-06T19:24:05Z 2018-09-06T19:24:05Z MEMBER

Or no index at all?

This would be my inclination (for the default behavior). It would mean that you could not longer count on anyways being able to do labeled indexing along each dimension, but in the broader scheme of things I don't think that's a big deal.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Let's list all the netCDF files that xarray can't open 350899839
419202871 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2368#issuecomment-419202871 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2368 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTIwMjg3MQ== shoyer 1217238 2018-09-06T18:51:11Z 2018-09-06T18:51:11Z MEMBER

Currently, xarray requires that variables with a name matching a dimension are 1D variables along that dimension, e.g., python for dim in dataset.dims: if dim in dataset.variables: assert dataset.variables[dim].dims == (dim,)

I agree that this unnecessarily complicates our data model. There's no particular advantage to this invariant, besides removing the need to check the dimensions of variables used for indexing lookups. I'm sure there are some cases internally where we currently rely on this assumption, but it should be relatively easy to relax.

{
    "total_count": 4,
    "+1": 4,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Let's list all the netCDF files that xarray can't open 350899839

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 3452.756ms · About: xarray-datasette