issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 344093951 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
409997671 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409997671 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTk5NzY3MQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-08-02T17:01:36Z | 2018-08-02T17:01:36Z | MEMBER | @aseyboldt Thanks! Please file issues for any feature requests you might have. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951 | |
409976901 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409976901 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTk3NjkwMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-08-02T15:56:06Z | 2018-08-02T15:56:06Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the feedback! @dcherian and @yohai have been making some nice improvements to plotting recently. It seems like each release has a few new features. Fortunately plotting goes in the category of "straightforward to improve without a major refactoring", which is probably why we didn't put it on the roadmap! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951 | |
408565221 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408565221 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODU2NTIyMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-07-27T23:50:23Z | 2018-07-27T23:50:23Z | MEMBER | Here are the responses on Twitter: https://twitter.com/shoyer/status/1021788358048010240 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951 | |
408564776 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408564776 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODU2NDc3Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-07-27T23:45:58Z | 2018-07-27T23:45:58Z | MEMBER | I think we merge this to make it more visible. @fmaussion - we got a few comments asking if/how the core changes proposed in xarray would make using the library more difficult. Those worries seemed to be easily put to rest. Beyond that, things seemed mostly positive/quite. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951 | |
408348531 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408348531 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODM0ODUzMQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-07-27T08:22:17Z | 2018-07-27T08:22:17Z | MEMBER | Any comment/suggestion from the larger xarray community? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4