issue_comments

Table actions

7 rows where issue = 344093951 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

author_association 2

issue 1

  • DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
409997671 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409997671 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTk5NzY3MQ== dcherian 2448579 2018-08-02T17:01:36Z 2018-08-02T17:01:36Z MEMBER

@aseyboldt Thanks! Please file issues for any feature requests you might have.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
409992634 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409992634 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTk5MjYzNA== aseyboldt 1882397 2018-08-02T16:45:44Z 2018-08-02T16:45:44Z NONE

I noticed and appreciate those plotting additions :-)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
409976901 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409976901 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTk3NjkwMQ== shoyer 1217238 2018-08-02T15:56:06Z 2018-08-02T15:56:06Z MEMBER

Thanks for the feedback!

@dcherian and @yohai have been making some nice improvements to plotting recently. It seems like each release has a few new features. Fortunately plotting goes in the category of "straightforward to improve without a major refactoring", which is probably why we didn't put it on the roadmap!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
409828598 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-409828598 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTgyODU5OA== aseyboldt 1882397 2018-08-02T07:08:27Z 2018-08-02T07:08:27Z NONE

This roadmap sounds great! We plan on using xarray to store all traces in pymc4. The biggest item on my wish list for that is better support for plotting. I regularly convert traces to pandas and use the plotting functions there, or I convert it so that I can use seaborn. Better support for hierarchical indexes sounds useful as well. They can be a bit surprising right now, and they can't be serialised to netCDF. The documentation is quite important our use case. As it is, we are asking our users to learn Bayesian stats, diagnosing sampler issues and possibly some theano or tensorflow. When we switch to xarray, our users have to learn the basics of that as well. Most won't even have heard about netCDF. One thing in particular that I noticed is that many people seem to get confused about the difference between coordinates and dimensions at some point.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
408565221 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408565221 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODU2NTIyMQ== shoyer 1217238 2018-07-27T23:50:23Z 2018-07-27T23:50:23Z MEMBER 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
408564776 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408564776 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODU2NDc3Ng== jhamman 2443309 2018-07-27T23:45:58Z 2018-07-27T23:45:58Z MEMBER

I think we merge this to make it more visible.

@fmaussion - we got a few comments asking if/how the core changes proposed in xarray would make using the library more difficult. Those worries seemed to be easily put to rest. Beyond that, things seemed mostly positive/quite.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951
408348531 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2309#issuecomment-408348531 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2309 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODM0ODUzMQ== fmaussion 10050469 2018-07-27T08:22:17Z 2018-07-27T08:22:17Z MEMBER

Any comment/suggestion from the larger xarray community? 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DOC: add initial draft of a development roadmap for xarray 344093951

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);