issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 337267315 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xarray.backends refactor · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 428055468 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2261#issuecomment-428055468 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2261 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyODA1NTQ2OA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-09T04:26:34Z | 2018-10-09T04:26:34Z | MEMBER | Nice work on this @shoyer. Really excited to set this free. |
{
"total_count": 3,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 3,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray.backends refactor 337267315 | |
| 428038801 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2261#issuecomment-428038801 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2261 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyODAzODgwMQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-10-09T02:28:41Z | 2018-10-09T02:28:41Z | MEMBER | based on the arrival of #2476 (!), I suggest we merge this. I think we've had enough review to justify this being put into a release candidate in the relatively near future. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray.backends refactor 337267315 | |
| 424946237 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2261#issuecomment-424946237 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2261 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNDk0NjIzNw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-09-27T03:23:41Z | 2018-09-27T03:23:41Z | MEMBER | I'd also be happy to see this go in. We could use a review from someone other than me. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray.backends refactor 337267315 | |
| 409012504 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2261#issuecomment-409012504 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2261 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTAxMjUwNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-07-30T21:13:37Z | 2018-07-30T21:13:37Z | MEMBER |
Any ideas of what is not working yet? I spent a fair bit of time wrestling with the distributed write problem earlier this year so can perhaps be of help here. Also cc @pwolfram who was an early interested party in this LRU cache idea. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xarray.backends refactor 337267315 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1