issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 299346082 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 368687352 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-368687352 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODY4NzM1Mg== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-26T23:22:37Z | 2018-02-26T23:22:37Z | MEMBER | I'm going to close now seeing that the upstream/pypy issue has been closed. @tlechauve - please keep us updated on the pypy integration of xarray and the development of your REST API. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
| 368082271 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-368082271 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODA4MjI3MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-23T17:37:42Z | 2018-02-23T17:37:42Z | MEMBER | @tlechauve - If your REST API is open source, would you mind sharing a link? I'd be interested to see what you're up to. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
| 367843351 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367843351 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzg0MzM1MQ== | benbovy 4160723 | 2018-02-22T22:24:34Z | 2018-02-22T22:24:34Z | MEMBER |
Can I ask what kind of performance issues do you have? I don't have much experience with PyPy, I'm just curious on cases where using xarray with PyPy represents a real advantage over using it with CPython. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
| 367802779 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367802779 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzgwMjc3OQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2018-02-22T19:58:55Z | 2018-02-22T19:58:55Z | MEMBER | +1 on reporting upstream if convenient |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
| 367795719 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367795719 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzc5NTcxOQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-22T19:37:51Z | 2018-02-22T19:37:51Z | MEMBER | It's exciting to see people testing xarray with PyPy! Once we get this working, we should consider adding a continuous integration test. The specific problem here seems to be I think this could be reproduced with something like the following using only the standard library: ``` import weakref import threading lock = threading.Lock() locks = weakref.WeakValueDictionary() locks['foo'] = lock ``` This works with CPython, but maybe not with pypy. CC @mrocklin in case he has any ideas. Otherwise if my code to reproduce works, I would suggest reporting this upstream to PyPy. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4