issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 299346082 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
368687352 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-368687352 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODY4NzM1Mg== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-26T23:22:37Z | 2018-02-26T23:22:37Z | MEMBER | I'm going to close now seeing that the upstream/pypy issue has been closed. @tlechauve - please keep us updated on the pypy integration of xarray and the development of your REST API. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
368082271 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-368082271 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODA4MjI3MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-23T17:37:42Z | 2018-02-23T17:37:42Z | MEMBER | @tlechauve - If your REST API is open source, would you mind sharing a link? I'd be interested to see what you're up to. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
367843351 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367843351 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzg0MzM1MQ== | benbovy 4160723 | 2018-02-22T22:24:34Z | 2018-02-22T22:24:34Z | MEMBER |
Can I ask what kind of performance issues do you have? I don't have much experience with PyPy, I'm just curious on cases where using xarray with PyPy represents a real advantage over using it with CPython. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
367802779 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367802779 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzgwMjc3OQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2018-02-22T19:58:55Z | 2018-02-22T19:58:55Z | MEMBER | +1 on reporting upstream if convenient |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 | |
367795719 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1935#issuecomment-367795719 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1935 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzc5NTcxOQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-22T19:37:51Z | 2018-02-22T19:37:51Z | MEMBER | It's exciting to see people testing xarray with PyPy! Once we get this working, we should consider adding a continuous integration test. The specific problem here seems to be I think this could be reproduced with something like the following using only the standard library: ``` import weakref import threading lock = threading.Lock() locks = weakref.WeakValueDictionary() locks['foo'] = lock ``` This works with CPython, but maybe not with pypy. CC @mrocklin in case he has any ideas. Otherwise if my code to reproduce works, I would suggest reporting this upstream to PyPy. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Not compatible with PyPy and dask.array. 299346082 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4