issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 298437967 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- isort · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
368910446 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-368910446 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODkxMDQ0Ng== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-27T15:12:12Z | 2018-02-27T15:28:14Z | MEMBER | @jhamman @shoyer green! No auto-check, but easier to add those in the future than thrash between too lenient and too harsh, imo |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 | |
367783314 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-367783314 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzc4MzMxNA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-22T18:55:29Z | 2018-02-22T18:55:29Z | MEMBER |
Would you prefer in allowed failures, or that's a bad middle-ground? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 | |
367783002 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-367783002 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzc4MzAwMg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-22T18:54:22Z | 2018-02-22T18:54:52Z | MEMBER |
+ the really cool feature is that it'll add commits with changes, where it can |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 | |
367776962 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-367776962 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzc3Njk2Mg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-22T18:34:21Z | 2018-02-22T18:35:06Z | MEMBER | We use flake8-isort, which implements One advantage of But stepping back, we should think about whether we want to mandate this on every PR. It doesn't matter that much (less than flake8 imo), and it can be frustrating to have formatting errors get in the way of a PR. A tool that automatically corrects the code like @stickler-ci is great, but it doesn't support this one. A compromise could be to put it in allowed failures in Travis? Or if people think we should add this, let's do it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 | |
367076037 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-367076037 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzA3NjAzNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-20T18:39:40Z | 2018-02-20T18:39:40Z | MEMBER | Updated |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 | |
366840478 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1924#issuecomment-366840478 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1924 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Njg0MDQ3OA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2018-02-20T01:18:43Z | 2018-02-20T01:18:43Z | MEMBER | Requires https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1925 to make @stickler-ci happy (and this needs to stop the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
isort 298437967 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1