issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 295959111 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • max-sixty · 4 ✖

issue 1

  • Representing & checking Dataset schemas · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
377012442 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-377012442 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NzAxMjQ0Mg== max-sixty 5635139 2018-03-28T19:46:33Z 2018-03-28T19:46:33Z MEMBER

The commentary in https://github.com/python/typing/issues/513, and @shoyer 's doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vpMse4c6DrWH5rq2tQSx3qwP_m_0lyn-Ij4WHqQqRHY/edit#heading=h.rkj7d39awayl are good & growing

I'll close this as I think riding on those coattails - with the addition of names and Datasets as containers - makes the most sense.

(though reopen if we think there's something we could productively do separately)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111
367855371 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-367855371 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Nzg1NTM3MQ== max-sixty 5635139 2018-02-22T23:13:55Z 2018-02-22T23:13:55Z MEMBER

@benbovy That looks v interesting. I think at the moment it would require a bit of work to validate normal xarray objects, is that right? (I'm looking at the __init__, which doesn't take the traditional args supplied to a Variable - tell me if I'm misreading it)

Separately - I didn't know about the project but looks awesome. Do we have a list of projects that integrate xarray? Let's start one somewhere if not @pydata/xarray ?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111
364599398 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-364599398 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDU5OTM5OA== max-sixty 5635139 2018-02-09T23:31:44Z 2018-02-09T23:31:44Z MEMBER

And let me know if there are already textual schema definitions from other libraries that you think are good, before we go and build our own (we don't work with any netCDF-like files so don't have that context)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111
364581903 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-364581903 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDU4MTkwMw== max-sixty 5635139 2018-02-09T22:01:39Z 2018-02-09T22:01:39Z MEMBER

I think the right word for this may be "schema"

Right! 🤦‍♂️

Just googling around, I came up with pandas-validator

Interesting, thanks.

Do you think this fits into a 'function which validates', rather than a Mypy-like type annotation? I think ideally there would be a representation of the schema that could work with both, so maybe this isn't the important question atm.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);