issue_comments: 364581903
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-364581903 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 | 364581903 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDU4MTkwMw== | 5635139 | 2018-02-09T22:01:39Z | 2018-02-09T22:01:39Z | MEMBER |
Right! 🤦♂️
Interesting, thanks. Do you think this fits into a 'function which validates', rather than a Mypy-like type annotation? I think ideally there would be a representation of the schema that could work with both, so maybe this isn't the important question atm. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
295959111 |