issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 287852184 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- v0.10.1 Release · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
368540882 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368540882 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODU0MDg4Mg== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-02-26T15:30:45Z | 2018-02-26T15:30:45Z | MEMBER | @Zac-HD: I hear your frustration! Thanks for putting some much needed pressure on this community to move to a faster release cycle. I think xarray is experiencing some growing pains as adoption increases. I generally favor automating as much as possible, modulo the necessary manual checks described by @shoyer. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368367665 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368367665 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM2NzY2NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-26T01:48:25Z | 2018-02-26T01:48:25Z | MEMBER | My messing around with tags seems to have been successful. The docs successfully build and been updated: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/whats-new.html It looks like the conda-forge update is also in progress: https://github.com/conda-forge/xarray-feedstock/pull/27 (thanks @jhamman and @ocefpaf !) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368362084 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368362084 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM2MjA4NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-26T00:54:15Z | 2018-02-26T00:54:22Z | MEMBER | I'm going to push another version of the 0.10.1 tag to GitHub that includes fixes to This will allow us to actually build docs for 0.10.1 on ReadTheDocs. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368361385 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368361385 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM2MTM4NQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-26T00:45:00Z | 2018-02-26T00:45:00Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - I can do the conda-forge update. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368360707 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368360707 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM2MDcwNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-26T00:38:19Z | 2018-02-26T00:38:19Z | MEMBER | I just pushed the release to pypi. I'm dealing with the RTD build now, which seems to have broken without us noticing! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368359451 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368359451 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM1OTQ1MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-26T00:22:29Z | 2018-02-26T00:22:29Z | MEMBER | I'm a enthusiastic 👍 for getting this release out ASAP and generally releasing more regularly. I take some of the blame for moving the goalposts for this release, particularly with regard to #1464. @shoyer - please go forward with the release and let me know if you need a hand with anything. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
368347844 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-368347844 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2ODM0Nzg0NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-25T21:46:40Z | 2018-02-25T21:46:40Z | MEMBER | @Zac-HD Thanks for raising these concerns! I agree there are only upsides to a faster release cycle, and three months is way too long given the long back-log of improvements we have. Even without more automation, we should not wait more than 2-4 weeks between releases unless there are breaking changes in process (which can sometimes require more refinement to get right). I think the trouble is that it's easy to get in a bad pattern of waiting for "just one more pull request" before issuing a new release. This is self-reinforcing -- the fewer releases we have, the more important it is to wait for a pull request before issuing a release. I'd love to explore a more automated release pipeline. Take a look here for our current release instructions: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/HOW_TO_RELEASE In my experience, the slowest step is clean-ups/fixes of the "what's new" docs page (e.g., what I just did in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1940). It's hard to do that as part of the regular PR process in part because we only see built docs after PRs are merged. That said, if we do this more regularly the work required decreases (I spent about half an hour on this today). Unfortunately, there is no automated substitute for a human looking over a document to verify that it looks right :). The actual release issuing process is quite fast once you know what you're doing, taking as little as half an hour minutes to update pypi, ReadTheDocs and conda-forge. But it would certainly be great if anyone (even non-maintainers) is capable of triggering this with a simple PR. Ideally, we should be able to issue a release anytime someone is willing to put in the effort of looking things over and ensuring the docs look right. Anyways, my plan is to issue a release later today or tomorrow, as soon as #1940 is merged. There are lots of other excellent improvements in the pipeline (rolling window improvements, distributed writes to netCDF files, etc.) but we should just issue another release when those get merged instead of holding things up! |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 | |
356999205 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1821#issuecomment-356999205 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1821 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1Njk5OTIwNQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-01-11T17:22:56Z | 2018-01-11T17:22:56Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
v0.10.1 Release 287852184 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4