issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 270677100 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add option “engine” · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
365842057 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-365842057 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NTg0MjA1Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-15T07:04:56Z | 2018-02-15T07:04:56Z | MEMBER | @ajelenak-thg thanks for your patience here. I need to think a little bit harder about what the right API for controlling the default engine is, but this work is definitely appreciated (and will probably make it in for the next release). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 | |
348155004 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-348155004 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODE1NTAwNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-30T10:58:20Z | 2017-11-30T10:58:20Z | MEMBER | One more minor complexity is that there are two version of netCDF, not all of which are supported by all tools:
So will need to distinguish between URLs (opendap) and these two types of netCDF files. To do this, we'll need to look at the first few bytes of each file:
- netCDF4/HDF5 starts with the 8-byte signature |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 | |
341795047 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-341795047 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTc5NTA0Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-03T18:51:49Z | 2017-11-03T18:51:49Z | MEMBER | Maybe it would make more sense to set a list of engines to try in order? e.g., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 | |
341613287 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-341613287 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTYxMzI4Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-03T03:04:17Z | 2017-11-03T03:04:17Z | MEMBER | We should probably have separate options for opendap/netcdf. It would not be so useful to try to use pydap to read a netcdf file. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 | |
341586491 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-341586491 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTU4NjQ5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-02T23:19:55Z | 2017-11-02T23:19:55Z | MEMBER | I like the direction this is going in, but as @MaximilianR notes it won't work to set this in default function arguments. Also, I would probably pick a more descriptive name for the option, e.g., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 | |
341577210 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1682#issuecomment-341577210 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1682 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTU3NzIxMA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2017-11-02T22:29:45Z | 2017-11-02T22:29:45Z | MEMBER | This looks great so far! But have you tested this? I have a suspicion that putting You could have a default arg of |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add option “engine” 270677100 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2