issue_comments
9 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 256496917 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex · 9 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 883607729 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-883607729 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840qsix | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-07-20T18:33:29Z | 2021-07-20T18:33:29Z | MEMBER | @hding1981 you would need to make a MCVE like this: https://matthewrocklin.com/blog/work/2018/02/28/minimal-bug-reports in a new issue. It's unlikely someone can help you debug your data. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 883589599 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-883589599 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840qoHf | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-07-20T18:04:52Z | 2021-07-20T18:04:52Z | MEMBER | @hding1981 IIUC this isn't supported at the moment. Though with the approaching index refactor, we may be able to support this more easily |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 329177780 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-329177780 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyOTE3Nzc4MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-09-13T14:03:06Z | 2017-09-13T14:03:06Z | MEMBER |
It's probably cleaner, because the dtype of PeriodIndex can be several things, i.e. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328654477 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328654477 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODY1NDQ3Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-11T20:50:16Z | 2017-09-11T20:50:16Z | MEMBER | It's only an Potentially we could some sort of API for surfacing this information, e.g., a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328637548 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328637548 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODYzNzU0OA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-09-11T19:43:19Z | 2017-09-11T19:43:19Z | MEMBER | OK, so the problem is that when given to Before @darothen 's https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1356, the piece if code that was executed is ```python
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328575741 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328575741 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODU3NTc0MQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-09-11T16:00:43Z | 2017-09-11T16:00:43Z | MEMBER | Indeed! Will look into it. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328573731 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328573731 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODU3MzczMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-11T15:54:19Z | 2017-09-11T15:54:19Z | MEMBER | Looks like https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1356, which introduced a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328469339 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328469339 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODQ2OTMzOQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-09-11T09:13:21Z | 2017-09-11T09:13:21Z | MEMBER | I was wondering which PR was responsible for the regression, but I guess I don't understand the internals well enough to classify this as "easy fix" for me ;) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 | |
| 328400022 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1565#issuecomment-328400022 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1565 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyODQwMDAyMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-11T02:31:41Z | 2017-09-11T02:31:41Z | MEMBER | I never intended to support time attributes on PeriodIndex objects so there was never any test coverage here, but I guess it has been working! Nonetheless this should be pretty easy to fix. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Regression: time attributes on PeriodIndex 256496917 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3