issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 232350436 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1400623411 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-1400623411 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Te9Ez | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-01-23T16:22:15Z | 2023-01-23T16:22:15Z | MEMBER | We should add a test for this then. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 | |
| 1400113151 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-1400113151 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TdAf_ | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-23T10:23:48Z | 2023-01-23T10:23:48Z | MEMBER | Works for me, as well, so I'm closing this. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 | |
| 1399895042 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-1399895042 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TcLQC | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2023-01-23T07:05:29Z | 2023-01-23T07:05:29Z | MEMBER | Works for me in latest main. #1438 might be closed, too. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 | |
| 388660444 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-388660444 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODY2MDQ0NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-05-13T22:27:28Z | 2018-05-13T22:27:28Z | MEMBER | @ctw I'm not sure why #1438 was closed (I think that was by mistake), but we would still need a fix along those lines to fix this issue. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 | |
| 305036355 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-305036355 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTAzNjM1NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-30T23:20:14Z | 2017-05-30T23:20:14Z | MEMBER |
Yes, otherwise we loose pandas (d)type information. For example, a |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 | |
| 305034234 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1434#issuecomment-305034234 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1434 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTAzNDIzNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-30T23:08:48Z | 2017-05-30T23:08:48Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the report, I'm marking this as a bug. The issue is with these lines in It seems like we now need some more complex logic for toggling between pandas |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.concat loses coordinate dtype information with recarrays in 0.9 232350436 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4