issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 217660739 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Marks slow, flaky, and failing tests · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
292434454 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1336#issuecomment-292434454 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1336 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjQzNDQ1NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-04-07T04:36:08Z | 2017-04-07T04:36:08Z | MEMBER |
Yes, this is a good idea.
Thanks for pointing this out! I'm not entirely sure pytest-rerunfailures is a fit here but it's a good option to know about. The tests are flaky on Travis-CI, but they are reliable when run locally, and we still want to keep them around as integration tests. These are slow tests that open and close quite a lot of files (2000 each). |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Marks slow, flaky, and failing tests 217660739 | |
291051992 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1336#issuecomment-291051992 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1336 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MTA1MTk5Mg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-04-03T05:30:23Z | 2017-04-03T05:30:23Z | MEMBER | Thanks @pwolfram! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Marks slow, flaky, and failing tests 217660739 | |
290255222 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1336#issuecomment-290255222 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1336 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MDI1NTIyMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-03-29T23:18:01Z | 2017-03-29T23:18:01Z | MEMBER | @pwolfram Thanks for putting this together. "Slow" tests on Travis aren't a huge problem -- it takes at least a minute for Travis to complete even in the best case scenario, so having to wait a minute more is not so bad. It's really an issue for interactive, local development, where it's really valuable for tests to complete in less than 10 seconds. Flaky tests, which fail sometimes, are the problem. So think we want a different category for these many file tests, maybe "Flaky". Ideally we would have an another Travis-CI job setup to run these that isn't required to always pass, like our existing jobs for testing development versions of other libraries. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Marks slow, flaky, and failing tests 217660739 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1