issue_comments
10 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 208215185 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Groupby-like API for resampling · 10 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
331495109 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-331495109 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTQ5NTEwOQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-22T16:27:28Z | 2017-09-22T16:27:28Z | MEMBER | In it goes. Thanks @darothen! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
331283075 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-331283075 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTI4MzA3NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-21T21:11:07Z | 2017-09-21T21:11:07Z | MEMBER | We just bumped numpy to 1.11, but 1.12 would be too new. Let's just add a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
331279024 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-331279024 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTI3OTAyNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-21T20:54:51Z | 2017-09-21T20:54:51Z | MEMBER | @darothen - almost there. Two or three more dependency conflicts in the tests. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
330909820 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-330909820 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMDkwOTgyMA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-20T16:37:59Z | 2017-09-20T16:37:59Z | MEMBER | Thanks @darothen - can you resolve the merge conflicts? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
330575547 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-330575547 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMDU3NTU0Nw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-19T15:23:54Z | 2017-09-19T15:23:54Z | MEMBER | @darothen - we have a few other PRs to wrap up for 0.10 so end of the week is okay. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
324175792 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-324175792 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNDE3NTc5Mg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-08-22T23:05:49Z | 2017-08-22T23:05:49Z | MEMBER |
This is OK by me |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
323500774 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-323500774 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyMzUwMDc3NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-08-19T04:58:56Z | 2017-08-19T04:58:56Z | MEMBER | I like your approach here! Just some various comments on the implementation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
315180497 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-315180497 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNTE4MDQ5Nw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-07-13T19:38:14Z | 2017-07-13T19:38:14Z | MEMBER | @darothen - can you give a summary of what's left to do here? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
283473505 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-283473505 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MzQ3MzUwNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-03-01T21:19:13Z | 2017-03-01T21:19:13Z | MEMBER |
I think this is mostly because TimeGrouper has been around far longer than non-aggregating resample. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 | |
281189948 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1272#issuecomment-281189948 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1272 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTE4OTk0OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-02-20T21:50:05Z | 2017-02-20T21:50:05Z | MEMBER |
Yes, use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Groupby-like API for resampling 208215185 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2