home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

11 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 205473898 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • jhamman · 11 ✖

issue 1

  • CFTimeIndex · 11 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 11 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
388602324 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-388602324 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODYwMjMyNA== jhamman 2443309 2018-05-13T05:17:59Z 2018-05-13T05:17:59Z MEMBER

Okay, I'm going to merge now. Hopefully a few of us can stress test this a bit more prior to the next release. Thanks @spencerkclark for all the work here over the past 15 months!!!

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 1,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
388264386 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-388264386 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODI2NDM4Ng== jhamman 2443309 2018-05-11T05:33:13Z 2018-05-11T05:33:13Z MEMBER

Tests are green here now. @shoyer and @spencerkclark - are we waiting on anything else before merging?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
385447271 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-385447271 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTQ0NzI3MQ== jhamman 2443309 2018-04-30T16:10:56Z 2018-04-30T16:10:56Z MEMBER

@spencerkclark - mind reporting the conda issue upstream at https://github.com/conda-forge/cftime-feedstock?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
385088915 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-385088915 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTA4ODkxNQ== jhamman 2443309 2018-04-27T20:43:45Z 2018-04-27T20:43:45Z MEMBER

ping @spencerkclark to finish this up. I just released a new version of cftime so this should be ready to wrap up.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
381131366 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-381131366 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MTEzMTM2Ng== jhamman 2443309 2018-04-13T13:14:26Z 2018-04-13T13:14:26Z MEMBER

@spencerkclark - things are well underway fixing up cftime. We'll need some namespace changes in xarray before things will work here. Do you want to do those or should I?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
380833398 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-380833398 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MDgzMzM5OA== jhamman 2443309 2018-04-12T14:51:23Z 2018-04-12T14:51:23Z MEMBER

I can push the name change on cftime forward over the next week. We should really wrap this up.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
373812493 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-373812493 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MzgxMjQ5Mw== jhamman 2443309 2018-03-16T18:56:50Z 2018-03-16T18:56:50Z MEMBER

I'm sufficiently pleased with this that I think we can merge this in more or less its current state. Given the size of the PR though, I'd like to have one more person review it in detail before it goes in. Any takers from @pydata/xarray? Maybe @spencerahill?

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
371988210 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-371988210 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTk4ODIxMA== jhamman 2443309 2018-03-10T01:04:38Z 2018-03-10T01:04:38Z MEMBER

there are some failing tests for the zarr backend, but I think those are unrelated (I fixed some that were).

Right. Those will be fixed once I merge #1793.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
358829484 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-358829484 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1ODgyOTQ4NA== jhamman 2443309 2018-01-19T00:37:00Z 2018-01-19T00:37:00Z MEMBER

cc @matt-long who was interested in this.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
300547434 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-300547434 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMDU0NzQzNA== jhamman 2443309 2017-05-10T17:02:17Z 2017-05-10T17:02:17Z MEMBER

@spencerkclark - two questions.

  1. How is this going? Could you use some help with anything?
  2. Pandas provides a convenience function to create arrays of datetime objects (pd.date_range). This function just passes its arguments directly on to DatetimeIndex. I'm wondering if we can provide an xr.date_range function that mimics the pandas version with an additional calendar argument?
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898
296787111 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1252#issuecomment-296787111 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1252 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5Njc4NzExMQ== jhamman 2443309 2017-04-24T18:47:24Z 2017-04-24T18:47:24Z MEMBER

My two cents. I think we want:

Always use netcdftime.datetime objects (and hence NetCDFTimeIndex) for representing dates with non-standard calendars

Presumably, we can address many of the negatives with this approach with follow-on PRs. The fallback logic in xarray right now for non-standard calendars is not something we want to keep and was mostly meant as a stop-gap until this feature came along.

{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  CFTimeIndex 205473898

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 961.48ms · About: xarray-datasette